Android mascot cuts a rug.

Tags: android
This is the Umeox Apollo, a budget Android smartphone powered by solar energy. It’s one of our favorite gadgets from last week’s Mobile World Congress 2011.

This is the Umeox Apollo, a budget Android smartphone powered by solar energy. It’s one of our favorite gadgets from last week’s Mobile World Congress 2011.

Sprint shows off the dual-screen, Android-powered Kyocera Echo smartphone.

Tags: android
Android-based headphones [via phandroid]

Android-based headphones [via phandroid]

Tags: android
At Apple’s earnings call yesterday, Steve Jobs went on what can best be described as an anti-Google rant, attacking the Android Platform. We’ve got a clever infographic featuring highlights from the rant via TechCrunch (above), as well as longer excerpts via Seeking Alpha's transcript (below):
Google loves to characterize Android as open, and iOS  and iPhone as closed. We find this a bit disingenuous and clouding the  real difference between our two approaches. The first thing most of us  think about when we hear the work open is Windows which is available on a  variety of devices. Unlike Windows, however, where most pc’s have the  same user interface and run the same app, Android is very fragmented.  Many Android OEMs, including the two largest, HTC and Motorola install  proprietary user interfaces to differentiate themselves from the  commodity Android experience. The users will have to figure it all out.  Compare this with iPhone, where every handset works the same.
He continued:
Even if Google were right, and the real issue is closed  versus open, it is worthwhile to remember that open systems don’t always  win. […]  In reality, we think the open versus closed argument is  just a smokescreen to try and hide the real issue, which is, what’s best  for the customer, fragmented versus integrated. We think Android is  very, very fragmented and becoming more fragmented by the day. And as  you know, Apple’s strives for the integrated model so that the user  isn’t forced to be the systems integrator.
RIM, the maker of the BlackBerry, didn’t escape Jobs’ tirade:
We’ve now passed RIM, and I don’t seem them catching up  with us in the foreseeable future. They must move beyond their area of  strength and comfort into the unfamiliar territory of trying to become a  software platform company. I think it’s going to be a challenge for  them to create a competitive platform and to convince developers to  create apps for yet a third software platform after iOS and Android.  With 300,000 apps on Apple’s App Store, RIM has a high mountain ahead of  them to climb.
Jobs also expressed doubt that the tablets that are coming to market will be able to rival the iPad:
[W]e think the current crop of seven-inch tablets are  going to be DOA, Dead on Arrival. Their manufacturers will learn the  painful lesson that their tablets are too small and increase the size  next year, thereby abandoning both customers and developers who jumped  on the seven-inch bandwagon with an orphan product. Sounds like lots of  fun ahead.
Visit HuffPost Tech for more.

At Apple’s earnings call yesterday, Steve Jobs went on what can best be described as an anti-Google rant, attacking the Android Platform. We’ve got a clever infographic featuring highlights from the rant via TechCrunch (above), as well as longer excerpts via¬†Seeking Alpha's transcript (below):

Google loves to characterize Android as open, and iOS and iPhone as closed. We find this a bit disingenuous and clouding the real difference between our two approaches. The first thing most of us think about when we hear the work open is Windows which is available on a variety of devices. Unlike Windows, however, where most pc’s have the same user interface and run the same app, Android is very fragmented. Many Android OEMs, including the two largest, HTC and Motorola install proprietary user interfaces to differentiate themselves from the commodity Android experience. The users will have to figure it all out. Compare this with iPhone, where every handset works the same.

He continued:

Even if Google were right, and the real issue is closed versus open, it is worthwhile to remember that open systems don’t always win. […] In reality, we think the open versus closed argument is just a smokescreen to try and hide the real issue, which is, what’s best for the customer, fragmented versus integrated. We think Android is very, very fragmented and becoming more fragmented by the day. And as you know, Apple’s strives for the integrated model so that the user isn’t forced to be the systems integrator.

RIM, the maker of the BlackBerry, didn’t escape Jobs’ tirade:

We’ve now passed RIM, and I don’t seem them catching up with us in the foreseeable future. They must move beyond their area of strength and comfort into the unfamiliar territory of trying to become a software platform company. I think it’s going to be a challenge for them to create a competitive platform and to convince developers to create apps for yet a third software platform after iOS and Android. With 300,000 apps on Apple’s App Store, RIM has a high mountain ahead of them to climb.

Jobs also expressed doubt that the tablets that are coming to market will be able to rival the iPad:

[W]e think the current crop of seven-inch tablets are going to be DOA, Dead on Arrival. Their manufacturers will learn the painful lesson that their tablets are too small and increase the size next year, thereby abandoning both customers and developers who jumped on the seven-inch bandwagon with an orphan product. Sounds like lots of fun ahead.

Visit HuffPost Tech for more.